Could love addiction beryllium consistent with well-being on this desire-fulfilment account?

Could love addiction beryllium consistent with well-being on this desire-fulfilment account?

Elektronische datenverarbeitung does seem possible. Specifically, if a subjekt desired, freely, to exist bei a wohnhaft state of extreme verve-even granting certain negative outcomes-while nevertheless being fully informed about the nature of addictive love, how it might affect her brain (and auf diese weise on), then love addiction and well-being might indeed coincide as part of such a charakter. On this view, treatment might elend be appropriate, even though negative consequences were present.

Finally, there are objective volte theories of well-being. According to mutma?ung theories (sometimes called substantive good or perfectionistic theories), certain things can beryllium good or badeort for a typ-and thus contribute to her well being-whether or bedrangnis they are desired and whether or elend they lead to a wohnhaft “pleasurable” mental state. Examples of “objectively” heilbad things include: being betrayed, being deceived, and gaining pleasure from cruelty.

On this vogel of theory, elektronische datenverarbeitung might be harder to square love addiction with any genuine sort of well-being-especially on the “narrow” view. That is, one could plausibly argue that only “normal” or “healthy” or “constructive” kinds of love are objectively constitutive of well-being, whereas love that had been extreme, compulsive, resultant from abweichend brain processes, or that carries negative consequences for one’s health or for other social relationships welches objectively badeort for one. If this were the case, then such a love could potentially be deserving of some gerust of treatment under the soulmates right conditions.

Examples of the sorts of things that have been proposed as being intrinsically good hinein this way are: gaining knowledge, having deep arbeitnehmer relationships (including being as part of love), engaging inside vernunftgema? activity, and developing one’s abilities

Yet what theory of well-being should one accept? Unsurprisingly, philosophers have long noted that each of the theories of well being outlined above capture something important and intuitive about what had been needed to live a good life, but weltraum have problems as well. Accordingly, many philosophers opt for a wohnhaft composite theory bei which well-being ended up being seen as requiring altes testament least certain aspects of kosmos of the theories. On this composite view, then, well-being is constituted by engaging within objectively worthwhile activities, which we desire, and which provide amiland with pleasure or other valuable mental states (Savulescu 2007).

To summarize, love will clearly beryllium eingeschaltet important component of any plausible theory of well-being. However, on a wohnhaft composite view, especially one which incorporates aspects of the objective-trick account, love that entails insufferable pain, that frustrates other important desires, or that stops one from engaging bei objectively worthwhile activities, might reasonably be taken to compromise well-being. The best life is notlage one that consumed by destructive or fleck-adaptive forms of love, but had been rather one as part of which love finds a stattlich harmony with other sources of the good.

Implications for treatment

What does weltall of this mean for treatment? With respect to the narrow view of love addiction, informationstechnologie means that we will need to make an ethical judgment about how narrow the diagnostic category should beryllium. How strong or destructive does love have to beryllium to qualify as addictive love? On the broad view, we face a wohnhaft similar challenge. Although edv ended up being that case that, on this view, everyone weltgesundheitsorganisation loves is technically addicted, only some subset of cases should be judged to beryllium appropriate candidates for treatment because of their effect(s) on other aspects of our well-being. Though the two views take radically different stances on the neurobiological underpinnings of problematic love, it was lautlos the case that for both views it was the negative consequences or harm of the ‘heilbad love’ that determine whether the typ or people involved should be considered appropriate subjects for the application of some remedy.